“There was a meeting of local editors. They collectively agreed that before Glasgow they wanted to make an editorial statement, ”Mr Thomson stated, maxim he had not seen the mask however assumed it was apt for an area viewers in every newspaper.
Pressed to behold if News Corp had a top-down editorial line that assured a constant message in its newsroom, Mr Thomson stated there was “great local autonomy” within the News Corp staff, however agreed that the corporate had a limpid philosophy.
“As a company, we clearly have a philosophy on individual freedom, on the role of the market, on the size of government. And in terms of opinion, whether the New York Post, or one of our newspapers, we feel free to express it, ”he stated.
Mr Thomson too weighed in on the rising political dispute over whether or not digital giants love Facebook ought to breathe handled love publishers and held legally trustworthy for the content material of their platforms.
“He’s an editor. They publish information, ”stated Thomson.
“There are so many roads by which we [media companies] can be held responsible. We are clearly making mistakes and we should be responsible for the mistakes, ”he stated, including“ unfortunately this is not yet the case for large digital platforms ”.
The function and repercussion of the Murdoch Empire on the Australian media panorama has been on the coronary heart of the investigation, which was established final 12 months by the Labor-Green-dominated committee following a petition line of former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd calling for a royal empower. within the affect of Murdoch.
Mr. Thomson is the fourth and most senior government of News Corp to testify within the inquest. Australian executives Michael Miller and Campbell Reid, and Sky News Australia boss Paul Whittaker have defended the corporate in earlier hearings.