nt.quantity principle – A significance sequence and Motzkin_numbers. Modular coincidence? Answer

Hello expensive customer to our community We will proffer you an answer to this query nt.quantity principle – A significance sequence and Motzkin_numbers. Modular coincidence? ,and the respond will breathe typical via documented info sources, We welcome you and proffer you fresh questions and solutions, Many customer are questioning in regards to the respond to this query.

nt.quantity principle – A significance sequence and Motzkin_numbers. Modular coincidence?

I’ve checked out two sequences of integers, each of which have a outstanding place in combinatorics. For instance, the primary seems in Stieltjes momentum sequences for pattern-avoiding permutations (behold web page 23)
$$a_n = sum_ {okay = 0} ^ n frac { binom {2k} okay binom {n + 1} {okay + 1} binom {n + 2} {okay + 1}} {(n +1) ^ 2 (n + 2)}.$$
The second seems in grid path enumerations as Motzkin_Numbers (a immediate cousin of the Catalan numbers)
$$b_n = sum_ {okay = 0} ^ { lfloor frac {n} 2 rfloor} frac { binom {n} {2k} binom {2k} okay} {okay + 1}.$$

In the module $$2$$ Arithmetic I come throughout a seemingly (fortunate) coincidence. Let me question:

QUESTION. Is that undoubted?
$$a_n equiv b_n mod 2.$$

we’ll proffer you the answer to nt.quantity principle – A significance sequence and Motzkin_numbers. Modular coincidence? query through our community which brings all of the solutions from a number of dependable sources.